Shareholders support key proposals and merger actions


Logo CSG Systèmes International
Logo CSG Systèmes International
  • Therapeutic businesses Shareholders have preliminarily approved merger-related measures, including the issuance of shares under the April 25, 2020 merger agreement, the spin-off of its biopharmaceutical businesses (Gear Therapeutics) and an amendment to change the company’s name to Z Squared Inc.

  • Shareholders also supported key governance and remuneration measures, including the Variable compensation plan 2025the election of directors effective upon closing of the merger, a one-time exchange of options for underwater options, ratification of the auditor and a non-binding advisory vote on remuneration.

  • The inspector reported that proposals 1 to 8 were previously approved an adjournment was therefore not necessary and the company stated that it would file the final results of the vote on Form 8-K within four working days.

  • Interested in CSG Systems International, Inc.? Here are five stocks we like best.

Coeptis Therapeutics Holdings Incorporated held its annual and special meeting of shareholders virtually, with Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board Michael Mehalick presiding. The company noted that the meeting was being recorded and outlined rules of conduct for participants using the webcast portal, including recording limitations and a request that shareholders submit only one question.

Mehalick introduced the management and board members in attendance, including Vice President of Operations and Director Dan Yerace, as well as other company representatives. Vice President of Compliance and Secretary Christine Sheehy indicated that notice of the meeting had been given and a quorum was present. The company also identified an independent election inspector, who signed an oath to perform his duties impartially and to count and review all votes.

As Berkshire exits its position in Kraft Heinz, is the stock a sell?

The company opened voting stations at the meeting and asked shareholders who had not yet voted by proxy to submit their vote via the virtual portal before the close of voting. Management said Proposals 1-5 were conditional on each other, meaning approval of each was required for any of them to be approved. The Board of Directors made a unanimous recommendation in favor of each of the proposals presented, and management indicated that the postponement proposal would not be necessary based on the expected results of the vote.

Shareholders were asked to vote on nine proposals, with the company referring participants to the proxy statement for detailed background information.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *